Major Claim Emerges in Disha Salian Case as Lawyer Alleges Sachin Vaze Has Information Linking Her Death to Sushant Singh Rajput Case
Mumbai: The Disha Salian death case has once again come into the spotlight following fresh claims made by advocate Nilesh Ojha, who represents Salian’s father. The allegations have emerged at a time when the case has seen renewed legal attention, with the Bombay High Court recently directing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over the investigation.
According to reports, Ojha has claimed that a team associated with former Mumbai Police officer Sachin Vaze approached his office and that Vaze was allegedly willing to provide information and testify in connection with the case. These claims have generated fresh discussion around the circumstances surrounding Salian’s death and its alleged connection with the death of actor Sushant Singh Rajput.
Claims About a Possible Link
Disha Salian, who had worked as a celebrity manager, died in June 2020, just days before Sushant Singh Rajput was found dead. The timing of the two deaths has led to years of public speculation about whether the cases were connected.
However, it is important to distinguish allegations and claims from established facts. Earlier police investigations did not establish a connection between the two deaths. The Bombay High Court’s latest intervention means the circumstances surrounding Salian’s death will now be examined through a fresh CBI investigation.
Lawyer Makes Further Allegations
Ojha has made several serious allegations regarding what he says Vaze knows about the case. Reports quoting the lawyer say that Vaze allegedly claimed to have knowledge of multiple killings and was prepared to disclose information as a witness.
These are claims attributed to the lawyer and have not been established by a court or an investigating agency. No conclusion regarding criminal responsibility can therefore be drawn from these allegations alone.
Why the Case Has Returned to the Spotlight
The Disha Salian case has remained a subject of intense public and media attention since 2020. In September 2026, the Bombay High Court directed the CBI to register an FIR and investigate the circumstances surrounding Salian’s death. The court also directed Mumbai Police to hand over relevant case records to the central agency.
The court’s order represents a significant development because the investigation will now be handled at the central level. The court has also stressed that individuals should not be treated as accused without sufficient evidence.
Connection With Sushant Singh Rajput’s Death
Sushant Singh Rajput died on June 14, 2020, several days after Salian’s death. Because of their professional association and the close timing of the deaths, speculation about a possible connection has continued for years.
The latest allegations have once again brought that question into public discussion. However, whether there was any actual criminal connection between the two deaths remains a matter for investigators to establish through evidence.
CBI Investigation Could Provide Answers
With the CBI now directed to investigate the Disha Salian case, attention is expected to focus on the available records, witness statements, forensic evidence and other material collected during earlier investigations.
The latest claims involving Sachin Vaze could become relevant if investigators formally examine them and find supporting evidence. Until then, the allegations should be treated as unverified claims rather than established facts.
Bottom Line
The latest statements by Disha Salian’s family’s lawyer have added another layer to a case that has remained under public scrutiny for years. The alleged willingness of Sachin Vaze to provide information and the claimed connection with the Sushant Singh Rajput case have sparked renewed debate.
With the CBI investigation now underway, the focus will be on evidence and official findings. The investigation will ultimately determine whether the allegations have any factual or legal basis.
Disclaimer: This article reports allegations and claims made by individuals involved in or commenting on the case. The allegations have not been independently established as facts, and guilt or criminal liability can only be determined through due legal process.
